Workshop Community Agreements

Group policies and community agreements are reviewed at the beginning of meetings each time a new person joins the team. These agreements were drafted by Ferananda Ibarra, Chris Corrigan, Krisztina Kun, Trilby Smith, Katy Golinsky, Gray Miller Creative, Ankit Chhabra, wolf, Nadja Petranovskaja, Brandy Agerbeck, Natalie Ord, Monica Brasov-Curca, Christine Martell, Jill Banting, Rachel Marcuse, Ken Lima-Coelho, Mark Busse, Julie Gieseke All conference participants agreed to abide by these agreements. Please pay attention to your own actions, be open to observations of your behavior, and be open to sharing comments with others about their actions. Whether you start with a list of suggestions or ask a group to make their own deals, you`ll find out what works for the group. And if I am a participant, here are some guidelines that I could personally suggest to create the conditions for good cooperation. Other ways to create group agreements may be better suited for shorter meetings or workshops, or for groups that don`t deal with emotional or controversial topics. These include: list of even or trio actions. Ask these groups to agree on their top 1-3 agreements in order of priority and rewrite each of them in one sentence or a simple sentence. You`ll probably need to model this. Group members are accountable to each other and to the community as a whole and are responsible for direct and open communication, transparency, and how we share and distribute power. In one of your first joint lessons, ask students to think about what they need to make the classroom environment safer, fairer, and more productive for learning: What would help us work better together? You can do this through individual writing prompts, a reflection pair version, or another active learning strategy. After giving students time to think and discuss in small groups, create a list of agreements together. You can also ask this question in advance via email or Quercus and ask students to contribute digitally to idea generation.

Whatever tools we use, we want to make deals where people learn what they need to learn together as openly and safely as possible. Developing community agreements is a powerful strategy for bringing a group together as a team. The process of creating agreements is often more important than the product. Agreements stem from a consensual process to identify what each person in the group needs from each other and commits to each other to feel safe, supported, open and confident. As such, they provide a common framework for how people strive to work and be together while taking transformative steps. Here are some tips for developing community agreements. There are many ways to create group agreements. When deciding which one to use, you can consider some of the following: But I`m recently home after a Lewis Deep Democracy training with more clarity.

Community agreements, or “security rules” in LDD jargon, can be a profound way to jointly build trust and security in conflict management. And they don`t have to be the first thing we do together (!). One of Deep Democracy`s trainers explained how it can be a choice to stop and ask groups to create their “safer rules” (what the group needs to feel safer and do their job well) just before they get into conflict or go further. It could be in the middle of the meeting, for example. When emotions are heightened and we ask people to name what they really need, it can help the group be more honest about what they need to participate. And if the group asks for rules at the beginning of the meeting, they know they`re already on the sidelines. Aha! So we can ask groups to create their own agreements from scratch, at a key time when we want to spend a lot of time together. These are the binding guidelines for our community to ensure an inclusive, equitable and student-centered space where all people can learn and grow. Created by a group of administrators, coaches and students, our agreements with the learning community will be a guiding tool to help us foster a healthy and prosperous learning environment for all. In addition to the agreements, neSAWG has certain assumptions that underpin the framework and activities of the conference. These assumptions were originally articulated by AORTA and are borrowed with gratitude! Sometimes, participants do not respect the community agreements they have set for themselves and for others.

When this happens, it is easier for agreements that everyone has actively agreed to deal with a particular behavior. As a tutorial leader or instructor, you can point out the lack of compliance and ask the class together how they want to deal with it. Or you can refer to the agreement and ask the person to change their behavior so that it conforms to the agreements. Both are useful, and what you do depends on how much time you have and how pervasive the problem is. The more you can democratize law enforcement, the more likely you are to have support, so think of it as an exercise to establish shared responsibility rather than exercising your authority. Operational agreements establish procedures or structures that we all agree to use (for example. B one process observer for each meeting). Also consider whether the work should be divided into other parts. The definition of community agreements or ground rules can foster a better dialogue with oneself, the group and the community. Monica Brasov-Curca told me on Facebook: “In a wonderful dialogue training, the trainer divided the basic rule exercise into 3 parts. 1.) Community Agreement 2.) Workshop conditions 3.) Intentions of the participants. And we helped shape all three.

It`s really beautiful. Relationship agreements with the community are about how we want to build relationships with each other (p. . B speak our truth, be present). There are many ways to create group agreements. When deciding which one to use, you can consider some of the following: whether the group will work together in the long run, how controversial the topic of the meeting or workshop is, how much time you have, and how much confidence the group has in you as a moderator. Recently, I have been rethinking community agreements. When is it better to suggest principles to the group, and when is it better for a group to create its own? For my graphic moderation workshops, I could start the room with a poster like the one in the image above – and ask the group if they have any changes or additions. Adjusting the sound of the front of the room works well – but only in low-conflict situations. For years, I`ve always asked groups to write them down together, but in short meetings or focus groups, when time is very precious or the group isn`t getting together for a high-stakes conversation, it can seem trivial to ask the group to participate in these container building activities. You can also use group agreements for group project work. Give each group time to develop their own agreements on how they will work together.

This can help alleviate the stress of unclear group work expectations, help students defend themselves and resolve conflicts together. Take your time to define what a Community agreement means. Change this definition if it is useful: Group policy/community agreements can be developed with stories to ensure clarity and understanding. .